Talk:California county's corporate anti-electioneering measure abandoned

Sources

Text of the ordinance Settlement Article on sttlement Press Release from Supporters Preliminary injunction press release

Done - added sources to sources section. Anonymous101^talk 20:06, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

International audience

Wikinews articles must be made digestible for international readers, not just US and UK readers. Cheers --SVTCobra 20:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, this story seems to have struck a chord with Wikinews editors. They loved it and published. --SVTCobra 21:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Review

Revision 724472 of this article has been reviewed by InfantGorilla (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This goes into a good deal of depth and carves out its own approach, rather than being constrained by the format of the local newspaper article. Regarding the above comment, I am from the UK, and as far as I can tell, the current version looks fairly digestible to a non-UK non-US audience, but if you still disagree, please post in more detail, or unpublish, or be bold. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 724472 of this article has been reviewed by InfantGorilla (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This goes into a good deal of depth and carves out its own approach, rather than being constrained by the format of the local newspaper article. Regarding the above comment, I am from the UK, and as far as I can tell, the current version looks fairly digestible to a non-UK non-US audience, but if you still disagree, please post in more detail, or unpublish, or be bold. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Is that the right T?

The link on WikipediA seems to be discussing a different M.T 68.39.174.238 04:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)