Talk:California's violent video game ban law ruled unconstitutional by US Court of Appeals

I CREATED this interesting news article on the California Video Game ban law. I am Philippines Judge Florentino Floro, having registered with Wikinews on December 3, 2008, and is a Wikinews:Editor as of January 12, 2009.

Something Different - In having written more than "70 articles" (here - User:Florentino Floro/MyList and in Wikipedia Encyclopedia User:Florentino Floro/MyList2), I live with my Philosophy and hope to elevate Wikinews to the phenomenal success of Wikipedia encyclopedia, by writing very comprehensive, detailed and fully synthesized news, amid collaboration of editors and the final touch of the reviewer. Please do not be annoyed if sometimes, (due to stress and human factor - plus the fact that as lawyer and judge, I never ever had enrolled in any journalism subject), I would tend to relax the copyright rules and style guide, but, without however, violating the SPIRIT AND INTENT of both international law of copyright, and Wikinews rules on style guide. REST ASSURED, that in writing every news article, I VALUE fairness, justice, integrity and honesty. This is what NEWS WRITING is all about. Please help in publishing this news. Cheers.- --Florentino Floro (talk) 09:28, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Other minor sources: [1]Parent group issues warning for Grand Theft Auto: The Lost and Damned

[2] Court Says California Game Rating Law Unconstitutional [3]Court Strikes Down California´s Violent Video Game Law--Florentino Floro (talk) 12:45, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

[4]Violent Video Game Law Ruled Unconstitutional --Florentino Floro (talk) 12:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

[5]Schwarzenegger game law overturned

[6]Court Denies Appeal For California Violent Game Law [7]Court opposes Calif. video game ban [8]California Violent Video-Game Ban Outlawed by Court (Update3) --Florentino Floro (talk) 08:22, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Review

Revision 770949 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 19:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 770949 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 19:34, 22 February 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.