Talk:CDU/CSU nominates Johann Wadephul as German Foreign Minister

Submitted for review

Thanks BigKrow (talk) 16:02, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

@Gryllida BigKrow (talk) 16:03, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Minor revision requested

Please add a photo and rename to 'CDU/CSU nominates Johann Wadephul as new German Foreign Minister' (cut out the 'new', if you can?) Thanks Gryllida (talk) 01:09, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

@BigKrow Gryllida (talk) 01:09, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi @George Ho @Wikiwide @BigKrow @Lofi Gurl @Back ache @Md Mobashir Hossain @Almondo2025 (if you want yourself removed or someone else added to this list, please inquire here) A revision has been requested. Here is a list of what to do. (If/when you intend to start working on it, please leave a message or mark the article with {{editing}}) See below: see above. Thanks Gryllida (talk) 04:45, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

@Gryllida, image and headline changed. Thanks. BigKrow (talk) 11:28, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

@BigKrow thanks. i just looked at wikilink, apparently, official title is "federal minister for foreign affairs", not "foreign minister". is this correct? if yes, then headline and first paragraph need to be revised. Gryllida (talk) 11:54, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

@BigKrow hi again

• I could not verify "Wadephul’s approach calls for a united European response to n military aggression and a proactive defense of and collective security." so i am planning to remove it until someone clarifies or adds a source
• essential information is missing that he would be first person in cabinet from that party in 60 years. please check the source and add it.
• essential information is missing about why they needed to pick a new foreign minister. this would be good to add.

thanks heaps Gryllida (talk) 12:11, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Review of revision 4853645 [Passed]

Revision 4853645 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:17, 29 April 2025 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: please see notes above for suggested revisions edits may be approved within next less than 24 hours after publication thanks The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4853645 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:17, 29 April 2025 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: please see notes above for suggested revisions edits may be approved within next less than 24 hours after publication thanks The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision requested

Hi @George Ho @Wikiwide @BigKrow @Lofi Gurl @Back ache @Md Mobashir Hossain @Almondo2025, @Dsuke1998AEOS, @Ternera (if you want yourself removed or someone else added to this list, please inquire here) A revision has been requested. Here is a list of what to do. (If/when you intend to start working on it, please leave a message or mark the article with {{editing}}) See below:

1) Essential information is missing that he would be first person in cabinet from that party in 60 years. Please check the source for correct wording and add it to the article.

2) Essential information is missing about why they needed to pick a new foreign minister. apparently they needed to pick whole cabinet. This would be good to add.

As the article was already published, there are only about 12 hours left to make these edits and them be approved.

Many thanks. Gryllida (talk) 20:26, 29 April 2025 (UTC)