Talk:Black spot on Jupiter is impact site, says NASA
 |
Revision 851362 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Nice coincedence! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 851362 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Nice coincedence! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
You should change the "is" in the title of the story to "was", or do something about the sentence "Wesley almost missed observing the spot" which seem to imply that the spot is gone. --80.167.173.75 (talk) 17:23, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Jupiter goes around every 9 hours -- so fast that if he's stayed in, it would have been on the other side of the planet a little later. --Killing Vector (talk) 19:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
.ta
edit{{Editprotected}}
Hi! Please add ta:வியாழன் கோளில் மோதுகை இடம்பெற்றதை நாசா உறுதிப்படுத்தியது interwiki link. Thanks, ×α£đ~es 23:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Drifting into view not out of view
edit{{Editprotected}}
"drifting out of view" should be "drifting into view". 84user (talk) 20:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC) (I've just added editprotected to this request to get some attention: note the spot was driting into view when Wesley was observing)-84user (talk) 11:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
- A change has been made, but not exactly what you requested. --Brian McNeil / talk 11:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)