Talk:Baby survives after stroller hit by train in Melbourne, Australia

Videos

I don't think this story is only available in videos. Yes videos are helpful, but text sources are easier and more reliable. Example: Not everyone has time to watch 3 videos, which could be anywhere from a minute to 10 minutes wrong. This is just my opinion though. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 16:37, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

It is a very valid point. Videos are instantly offputting due to unknown duration, load on network connection, high probability of being taken down in the short-term, well-nigh impossible to pin down a quote somewhere in a video. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 16:42, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Review of revision 897696 [Failed]

Revision 897696 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: Headline is misleading and deliberately sensationalist Style: Not ready: Again - Wikinews does not use a sub-heading within articles - Fail for this. Also, Fail for deliberately misleading headline. Body of article states child was pushed, not run over. Comments by reviewer: Goddamned sensationalism. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 897696 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:29, 16 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: Headline is misleading and deliberately sensationalist Style: Not ready: Again - Wikinews does not use a sub-heading within articles - Fail for this. Also, Fail for deliberately misleading headline. Body of article states child was pushed, not run over. Comments by reviewer: Goddamned sensationalism. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Total rewrite

I did a total rewrite of the article. I watched both videos listed, though they are both CNN. Listed both because the CNN direct video does not work for me. Maybe it does for others, or doesn't, but I added a second link to YouTube which is supposedly the same report. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 18:14, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

The CNN video works for me. Tempodivalse [talk] 00:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Review of revision 897969 [Passed]

Revision 897969 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:41, 17 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: It's a bit unusual to have a video as a primary source, but CNN is reliable/verifiable, so I see nothing wrong. Everything checks out, so this looks good to go. Tempodivalse [talk] 00:41, 17 October 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 897969 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:41, 17 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: It's a bit unusual to have a video as a primary source, but CNN is reliable/verifiable, so I see nothing wrong. Everything checks out, so this looks good to go. Tempodivalse [talk] 00:41, 17 October 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Name

The name of the mother is released, alright. Her name is Shweta Verma.