Talk:BBC's attempt to tarnish Prophet TB Joshua's legacy falls flat in Nigeria

This talk page has been submitted for speedy deletion according to the Criteria for speedy deletion. The reason given was: Orphaned talk page If you think this deletion is unwarranted, or have fixed the problem outlined above, please leave a note below.

This talk page has been submitted for speedy deletion according to the Criteria for speedy deletion. The reason given was: Orphaned talk page If you think this deletion is unwarranted, or have fixed the problem outlined above, please leave a note below.

Pre-review tasks

Published articles require two recent sources that support the headline. The phrase "baseless fabrications" is loaded and implies a judgment that may not be neutral. A more neutral phrase could be used to describe the allegations without implying they are true or false. The article could also be expanded to include background on Prophet TB Joshua. Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 14:28, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Review of revision 4775412 [Not ready]

Revision 4775412 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: The sources are highly problematic, on their face. NPOV: Not ready: This smells like a puff piece; if we could get some better sourcing, it might work Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Not quite ready -- sorry. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4775412 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: The sources are highly problematic, on their face. NPOV: Not ready: This smells like a puff piece; if we could get some better sourcing, it might work Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Not quite ready -- sorry. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.