Talk:BBC's Mock The Week 'breached guidelines' with Olympian humour, say corporation's Trust

Review of revision 900190 [Passed]

Revision 900190 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 900190 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

"The comments"

This whole article is about "the comments", but it never actually says what "the comments" were. GPHemsley (talk) 15:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

This should be added. I don't know the girl so I don't know what's worthy of being made fun of about her. Mike Halterman (talk) 11:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Done. Mike Halterman (talk) 11:07, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Title

Seeing as "Olympian" is a demonym of "Olympics", which is a proper noun, shouldn't that be capitalised in the title? Tempodivalse [talk] 02:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Moved. Mike Halterman (talk) 11:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Category

{{edit protected}}

Please add this article to Category:Daily Telegraph (United Kingdom). Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 22:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Done --Pi zero (talk) 23:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)