Talk:Authors question CIA redaction of NYT Op-Ed on Iran policy

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Woozle in topic another reason to rename

Links over to wikipedia are of the form [[w:Example|Link text]]. Article should be filled out to more than a few sentences before publishing. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

What have others news outlets and reporters said about this? Direct quotes from parties involved would help clarify what's going on. Sj 21:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Other media outlets and blogs, Slashdot among them; have piped up:

Furthermore, Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) sent President Bush a letter asking for an explanation:

I'll whip the article into shape later today. Kencf 22:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

You might want to rename it too, something mentioning either who redacted, the content of the op-ed, or something like that. --Brian McNeil / talk 22:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

another reason to rename edit

The article was, as I understand it, about Iran policy, not Iraq... -- (User:Woozle) 00:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Authors question CIA redaction of NYT Op-Ed on Iran policy" page.