Talk:Authors question CIA redaction of NYT Op-Ed on Iran policy

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Woozle in topic another reason to rename

Links over to wikipedia are of the form [[w:Example|Link text]]. Article should be filled out to more than a few sentences before publishing. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

What have others news outlets and reporters said about this? Direct quotes from parties involved would help clarify what's going on. Sj 21:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Other media outlets and blogs, Slashdot among them; have piped up:

http://news.com.com/2061-10802_3-6145778.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/2006/12/22/the-paper-of-mostly-on-t_e_36924.html

Furthermore, Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) sent President Bush a letter asking for an explanation:

http://rawstory.com/slaughterletter.pdf

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Slaughter_asks_Bush_why_he_censored_1220.html

I'll whip the article into shape later today. Kencf 22:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

You might want to rename it too, something mentioning either who redacted, the content of the op-ed, or something like that. --Brian McNeil / talk 22:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

another reason to rename

edit

The article was, as I understand it, about Iran policy, not Iraq... --24.136.238.245 (User:Woozle) 00:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Return to "Authors question CIA redaction of NYT Op-Ed on Iran policy" page.