Talk:At least 21 dead after coal mine explosion in Chinese mine

Review of revision 1019769 [Failed]

Revision 1019769 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:25, 14 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: A few more links would be nice, for example to the WP article on the city (assuming there is one). Also, there seems to be a lot more information in the sources than there is here- is there any more information that could be added? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:25, 14 May 2010 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1019769 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:25, 14 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: A few more links would be nice, for example to the WP article on the city (assuming there is one). Also, there seems to be a lot more information in the sources than there is here- is there any more information that could be added? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:25, 14 May 2010 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

• Well, perhaps I can add a few links, but if you look at the sources, you'll note that most of the content is extraneous "background information" that isn't really relevant to this particular event. I already added some background context in the last paragraph, I think that is sufficient. Will drop a few more links and resubmit for review. Tempodivalse [talk] 16:30, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

  Resubmitted for review. Tempodivalse [talk] 16:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1019806 [Passed]

Revision 1019806 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: works for me :). Nicely done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1019806 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: works for me :). Nicely done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:33, 14 May 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.