Talk:Afghan employee kills U.S. citizen at Kabul CIA base

Review of revision 1292450 [Failed]

Revision 1292450 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:47, 27 September 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below: NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Two major problems leap out: First is this Green Zone business - that's in Baghdad. It is used as a metaphor in the sources, but this article goes so far as to claim it is a real place in Kabul. It is not. The actual location is not described as fortified - just as "heavily guarded". A second problem is that the MSNBC source draws upon the Reuters source. Whilst these are both fine to use, adding a third, more independent, source would be ideal. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1292450 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:47, 27 September 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below: NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Two major problems leap out: First is this Green Zone business - that's in Baghdad. It is used as a metaphor in the sources, but this article goes so far as to claim it is a real place in Kabul. It is not. The actual location is not described as fortified - just as "heavily guarded". A second problem is that the MSNBC source draws upon the Reuters source. Whilst these are both fine to use, adding a third, more independent, source would be ideal. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1293560 [Passed]

Revision 1293560 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:12, 30 September 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Really right on the borderline length-wise; the minimum is three paragraphs. I should perhaps have noted that in my prior review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1293560 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 11:12, 30 September 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Really right on the borderline length-wise; the minimum is three paragraphs. I should perhaps have noted that in my prior review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.