Talk:168-centimetre water main breaks near Washington D.C.
Review edit
 |
Revision 744351 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Reviewed as per breaking The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 744351 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Reviewed as per breaking The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Nonsensical unitary system edit
Wouldn't it make more sense to just say "5½ feet" than to convert into metric, where its some bizzare number, especially since it was undoubtedly specified and manufactured in feet and occurred where everyone knows feet and a few know "centimetres" ? 76.117.247.55 17:50, 23 December 2008 (UTC) PS. Same for reporting in Centigrade over Fahrenheit.
- Most of the world (including me, and I assume whomever wrote this) does not live in the united States and might not know how big 5.5 feet is. (Although personally I'd say 1.6 metres instead of 168cm). Although then again I find the choice of centigrade (as opposed to celcius) somewhat odd, but thats just me, and it really doesn't matter. Bawolff ☺☻ 04:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)