Talk:'Statues of Democracy' removed in Hong Kong
Review of revision 1031345 [Failed]
edit
Revision 1031345 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:26, 29 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The article is not written with Wikinews Style in mind and some sentences are confusing. Also, please add at least one English language source. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1031345 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:26, 29 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The article is not written with Wikinews Style in mind and some sentences are confusing. Also, please add at least one English language source. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- I'd like to note that having at least one English source is not a prerequisite - we occasionally publish articles that are entirely based on foreign languages. I'd suggest using either Babel or IRC to find a Chinese-reading person, or else attempt using Google Translator. Tempodivalse [talk] 16:48, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 1031726 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1031726 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The articles for review clean-up has started. The article looks fine. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1031726 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The articles for review clean-up has started. The article looks fine. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |