Comments:Wikinews interviews U.S. Libertarian Party presidential candidate R. Lee Wrights

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Comments from feedback form - "A well done interview, some mo..."

A well done interview, some more specific questions would help the reader get a better feel for the candidate.

162.135.0.6 (talk)16:40, 28 July 2011

Comments from feedback form - "It would have been nice to fea..."

It would have been nice to feature some follow-up questions, instead of how it is now, when it seems that there only are some standard, pre-written questions that are asked.

Calandrella (talk)21:28, 22 June 2011

What would you have liked for me to ask?

The questions here are the same as at Wikinews interviews U.S. Libertarian Party potential presidential candidate R.J. Harris. I asked the questions to all Libertarian candidates to get a good comparison. Though many showed interest, at this time only Harris and Wrights have filled out the questionnaire. I was initially going to put the answers for all the candidates together on one page for comparison, but Harris had very long answers, and seemed to be the only one who was going to do it.

William S. Saturn (talk)22:16, 22 June 2011

I, for one, appreciate your format. Too much political jargon and double talk and I get confused. A failing of mine, I fear, to have such a low tolerant for political talk, and such difficulty understanding it.

Mattisse (talk)22:34, 22 June 2011
 
 

Comments from feedback form - "Nice piece -- crisp. clear, an..."

Nice piece -- crisp. clear, and with valuable info. Thanks.

208.95.148.1 (talk)12:59, 21 June 2011

I agree. Finally a politician who gives clear answers!

Mattisse (talk)13:14, 21 June 2011

Indeed. While there are certainly some places where we disagree, I do appreciate his honesty and openness.

166.137.139.208 (talk)23:48, 21 June 2011
 
 

Comments from feedback form - "{All}"300 million Americans ha..."

{All}"300 million Americans have 2 choices for president? Can you imagine having 2 colors to pick for your car? Red or Blue. No silver, or black w/ chrome rims. No racing yellow or hunter green. Nope - 2 colors, red or blue. The 2 party system has failed us. Our corrupt corporate propaganda media has failed us. You cannot give 300 million people 2 choices & expect change. They feign fighting on TV while they sleep together at night. We need a 3rd, 4th, 5th choice to fairly represent us" -shwantz2 on youtube

"A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny." - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

"In war, truth is the first casualty." - Aeschylus

"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth." - Albert Einstein

4.252.11.226 (talk)11:43, 21 June 2011

For some reason your post just says 1984. Which is really sad that that book did kind of come to fruition in a way.

24.27.23.39 (talk)15:00, 21 June 2011
 

It should be like Canada, where the politicians have only one month to prepare, giving them less time to tell us lies and false promises.

SweetNightmares (talk)18:58, 20 June 2011