Comments:Wikinews interviews Scott Lucas, Eyal Zisser, Majid Rafizadeh about risks of US military intervention in Syria

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion


Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Syria 117:25, 20 September 2013

The whole Syrian war is based on lies, the so called freedom fighter "rebels" are a bunch of Islamic fundamentalists who chop of heads of Catholic priests. The US supports them because like all right wing fanatics they support the US government and their wars of "liberation." (talk)16:52, 20 September 2013

Seems a bit oversimplified. Just because a bunch of rebels are bad people doesn't mean those they're fighting aren't bad people.

Pi zero (talk)17:25, 20 September 2013