Comments:Wikileaks spokesperson discusses recent court case with Wikinews

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


This is how Lavely and Singer works. They have even scared off wikipedia. A low level comedian, mathilde aka tig notaro, has hired Allison Sievers from Lavely and Singer to represent her against someone this notaro wronged. Instead of coming clean this noname comedian decided she needed to dole out lots of dough to beat this person down. Sievers for her part, didn't make any effort at reasonable inquiry. Instead,she send abusive motions filled with actionable defamation. She made bizzarre threats to testify in court against the victim even though their is no rational way she could do so.

This lawyers works of counsel and yet doesn't make any effort to divulge that and so Lavely and singer is responsible for the sactions that will be granted if the judge is not in their pocket.

Shame on you Marty Singer! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jojoyoyo (talkcontribs) 15:41, 13 November 2008