Comments:WHO's reaction to H1N1 influenced by drug companies, reports claim

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "This is terrible. Now that eve..."010:01, 7 June 2010
Comments from feedback form - "'...a 'monumental error' drive..."005:12, 7 June 2010
Not surprising001:33, 7 June 2010

Comments from feedback form - "This is terrible. Now that eve..."

This is terrible. Now that even WHO is commercialised, I can't imagine which organisation will 'turn bad' next. Please don't let it be GreenPeace or FoE. :(

Kayau (talk · contribs)10:01, 7 June 2010

Comments from feedback form - "'...a 'monumental error' drive..."

'...a 'monumental error' driven by profit-hungry drug companies spreading fear.' looks like a tabloid headline.

89.191.147.251 (talk)05:12, 7 June 2010

Not surprising

I actually wondered about that after the last news story which stated that the WHO still considered H1N1 a pandemic. It seemed like something that was just set up by a drug company and didn't seem to connect with the real world situation at all because I'm pretty sure if there were actual H1N1 outbreaks, we'd hear of the deaths by now.

64.252.143.208 (talk)01:33, 7 June 2010