Comments:Vitamin D deficiency more common, serious, than thought

don't like title, but getting the news out is the main thing edit

Back to article


This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

The current title is:Vitamin D deficiency more common, researchers say. This title doesn't reflect the first paragraph well-which tells the benefits of Vitamin D and thus the gravity of a deficiency, before telling about deficiency rates. In addition, I now think there needs to be a transitional phrase(such as "in addition") to start the sentence currently beginning:They say there is an emerging consensus... The reason I'm not making any changes though I originated the article is I'm a newbie, I don't know much about stylistic guidelines etc. Regards, 05:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Richard L. Peterson 05:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply