Comments:US presidential candidate Barack Obama has 50% support
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
CRTAINLY BARACK OBAMA IS A PRIME CANIDATE TO WIN THE THE ELECTION AS WE ALL KNOW,BARACK WILL BECOME THE FIRST OF MANY BLACK PRESIDENTS. HOPEFULLY BARACK OBAMAA WILL NOT BE PHUCKED OUT OF WINNING THE WHITE HOUSE ,AS WE ALL KNOW BY NOW THAT MANY AMERICANS DO NOT WANT A BLACK PRESIDENT,WELL ITS A GREAT THING THAT WE BELIEVE IN GOD AND HE WILL ALLOW US TO MOVE FORWARDIN THE BATH OF CHANGE.DONT GET ME WRONG IT WUOLDNT MATTER IF THE NEXT PRESIDENT WERE GREEN OR BLUE AS LONG AS WE HAVEA MAN THAT CAN LIFT US OUT OF THE HOLE THAT HAS BEEN CREATED BY ???? IM NOT HERE TOPOINT FINGERS ,BUT WE MUST MOVE AWAY FROM THE PATH THAT PRESIDENT BUSH HAS LED US DOWN. UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMAA THIS COUNTRY WILL BE LIFTED FROM UNDER THESE FINANCAIL BURDENS THAT ALL AMERICANS ARE UNDER.ONE THING THAT HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN MUCH ATTENTION,AND BY THE WAY I AM HIGHLY UPSET ABOUT IS THE ISSUE OF POVERTY IN AMERICA. WE NEED TO TAKE TIME AND CONSIDER THE POOR,AS WELL AS THE RICH AND MIDDLE CALSS. NOW IS THE TIME THAT WHEN WE REBOUND FROM THESE HARD TIME THAT WE AS NATION DO SOMETHING FOR THE POOPR AND UNDERPRIVILAGE OF AMERICA. I BELIEVE ONCE WE HANDLE THAT SITUATION WE CAN GET ON WITH THE REST.GOD BLESS US ALL GOBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GOBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!
- I'm guessing you're cap lock is broken too? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.17.181 (talk) 03:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
What a load of crap
editYeah, I don't care who you are or what your subject matter expertise is, you're a liar if you say this poll has a .7% error rate. No one asked me. No one I talk to on a regular basis has been asked. The math doesn't work. This is wishful thinking.
- More or less, most of the population does not matter and things are decided by the choices of very small groups in key areas, with relatively slim margins which can be polled and subjected to statistical analysis. Not so hard to understand is it? 68.210.66.232 06:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- I just don't like a poll that range from 1000-5000 people represent the whole county. --66.229.17.181 08:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
Out of curiousity 66.229.17.181, when was the last time you took a course on statistics? I don't know how it is that the people used in this poll were sampled(phone, mail, voter registery, etc), but if they were sampled properly then there's no reason to automagically suspect the results just because only a thousand people get polled. gb2mathclass —Preceding unsigned comment added by ValeofAldur (talk • contribs) 17:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
RIGHT MAN FOR PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES
editCAN HE PASS A HIGHLY SCRUTINIZED SECURITY CLEARANCE TEST TO BE A FEDERAL EMPLOYEE;I THINK NOT WOULD HE GET HIGH SECURITY CLEARANCE BY ASSOCIATION HOW SLIGHT WITH BILL AYERS,, HIS MINISTER FOR 20 YEARS SPEWING RADICAL AMERICAN HATRED IN CHURCH..BEING ENDORSED BY RADICAL ISLAMIST FARAKHAN..DONATING $800,000 TO A RADICAL LEFTIST LIBERAL ORGANIZATION BEIN RAIDED AND INDICTED FOR VOTER FRAUD FOR DEMOCRATS.BEEING A LAWYER FOR THAT ORGANIZATION...HOW COULD HE GET THAT CLEARANCE AND STILL BE QUALIFIED TO RULE OUR COUNTRY FOR 4 YEARS.ALL THESE CAMPAIGN RETHORIC THAT HE IS GOING TO DO FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS IS BACKLESS SPEWING AND SAYING ANYTHING TO REACH HIS GOAL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.135.61.172 (talk) 17:47, 11 October 2008 (UTC)