Comments:US military says 'fireballs' spotted over Texas are not related to satellite collision

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

• Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
• Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
• You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

Mario has to lay off the fire flowers. Fephisto (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

quick to dismiss...

A Kosmos satellite that crashed over northern Canada a couple of decades ago was powered by a nuclear thermocouple. I wonder if this is why they were so quick to dismiss the idea the fireballs were related to the crash? Geo Swan (talk) 00:30, 24 February 2009 (UTC)