Comments:UN passes LGBT rights resolution
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Ositadinma Anaedu | 0 | 07:00, 16 November 2015 |
| Yes!! | 4 | 13:28, 10 September 2011 |
If you are human, then you have inherent human rights. I guess Ositadinma Anaedu is trying to say LGBT people aren't human. But if he can't recognize a human, are we sure he is not a confused ape? I mean seriously "what if" right?
If it involves only CONSENTING ADULTS, it's no one else's concern.
Now if only the UNHRC would get some sense knocked into them concerning their defamation of religion resolutions...
why can't i duel my friend to the death then?
I agree, consenting adults duelling to the death should also be considered. South Africa is a fucked-up cuntry, I know because I live in it.156.8.251.250 (talk) 05:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Because your duel to death causes harm to you or your friend, who are citizens of your country. If you want to do it, go ahead. This is your choice. Any harm that befalls you is your fault. However in this case, the gay community is being targeted for no fault of their own, even though they have not harmed anyone else. Hence it is og greater importance to end discrimination, than to channel resources into legalizing dueling.