Comments:UK sex offenders to be banned from some websites

Latest comment: 16 years ago by 71.76.220.48

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


Can they get an other email?

Obviously I don't know bit I'd guess theres something stopping that. --Anonymous101 (talk · contribs) (Note I have no link with the organization anonymous) 17:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
nope. Even if their computers are being watched, the go to their public library, register as Bob Notsexoffender, and get an internet connection not associated with their name. What a bullshit move. I understand the intentions, but seriously, this will not accomplish much. People are always able to find a way. Rekov - (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, this isn't gonna do squat.--66.75.48.94 22:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Makes sense to me. I'm all for it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stormchaser (talkcontribs) 06:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

This isn't gonna work at all, and I don't see how facebook or myspace would have to comply if they are located in another country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.76.220.48 (talk) 00:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply