Comments:UK government sells stake in nuclear weapons firm
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Mugabe's fault! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.241.108.207 (talk • contribs)
- I've been seeing you post this around all over the place, what's the point you're trying to make? Fephisto (talk) 18:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
It goes to say that the u.k. s plan for the sarin gas technology in exchange for thermonuclear plans from the americans on à vis à vas rate of exchangement. Talk of perpetuating of more WAYS to kill.each other.