Comments:UK government loses personal information of 25 million people

Latest comment: 16 years ago by 86.10.70.180 in topic ...

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


Don't think I would want these families information if they are on government assistance!!

Glad to hear you don't want to steal from them because you think they are poor! However perhaps the article is not clear for non-uk readers. All families with children in the UK, rich and poor are on the database as it is a non-means tested benefit, effectively just a negative tax for parents.Billlion 12:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

TNT edit

Shouldn't thier contract be reviewed? Loosing something this important on what they knew was Govt data is a fairly serious matter, I wonder if the Royal Mail (which used to handle this sort of things) would have treated such items so casually? 62.56.76.71 17:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's about time we all realized, that world is changing. If you want to be protected, protect yourself, or live in a cave —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.235.44.146 (talk) 23:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

not just a coincidence? edit

3 major losses of data since last month can't just be coincidence can it? sounds like someone might be targeting this information. Wikidsoup 20:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Encryption v. password protected. edit

Can anyone explain how the disks, or possibly files, were "password protected" without being encrypted? Is it likely that files were created by a database program that just uses weak encryption, or obscurification?Billlion 12:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

... edit

mother .. fuckers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.10.70.180 (talk) 19:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)Reply