Comments:U.S. military denies reports helicopter opened fire on Libyan civilians during rescue mission

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
Comments from feedback form - "An Osprey is noy a Helicopter." | 0 | 16:13, 8 April 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "no refs" | 1 | 16:38, 31 March 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "why no inline citations like w..." | 2 | 16:38, 31 March 2011 |
bunch of liars | 1 | 02:25, 24 March 2011 |
An Osprey is noy a Helicopter.
why no inline citations like wikipedia? fails my sniff test verifiability, etc. i'll stick to reading actual news sites such as bbc, cnn, abcnews, nbcnews, nytimes, daily telegraph, al jazeera, et al.
regards.
emend my earlier entry. also, will also just continue to go to wikipedia for the broad, comprehensive picture since wikipedia is heavily sourced with inline citations.
<laughs> Wikipedia should not be considered reliable. They do no peer review, so you're misinformed as to what constitutes "reliable".
I agree that their articles probably have more detail; that is because they're encyclopedic, not actual news reports.
if they actually shot civilians, they wouldn't tell, right? like http://www.collateralmurder.com/ , that was acknowledged only after the video was leaked =/
Oh hey it's the video of group of journalist walking next to armed men after ambushing US soldiers.