Comments:Two largest known prime numbers discovered just two weeks apart, one qualifies for $100k prize
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
umm pretty cool.. i guess if im allowed to say that (i am sarcastic) its actually pretty lame.
The Natural World and discoveriesEdit
I am grateful to be still alive and see this discovery, because in the future with faster models necessary to retain information that may take 1,000's of years, we can experience now because life as humanly as we know it, does not last actually a long time, so retrieving information, data in faster ways and models assists the human being with accessing information faster and therby may assist in other discoveries for helping our world in all fields of research.
Good going GIMPS!
It would be interesting to state what order the two primes numbers found occuptyin Mersene "family". Some mention to other sources of Mersene primes woulb be interesting Is there a list of who and when Mersene primes have been found? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.8.131.52 (talk • contribs)
Comments from feedback form - "hello"Edit
Comments from feedback form - "wow...great"Edit
Comments from feedback form - "AMAZINF. :-)"Edit