Comments:Tibetans say 80 killed in protests; China continues to crack down

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

• Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
• Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
• You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

The Chinese government has been an occupying force in Tibet for too long, FREE TIBET! --Mrlego9 - (talk) 16:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Good luck with that. Spacehusky - (talk) 17:49, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Let's award China with the opportunity to host the Olympic Games! Oh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.236.21.115 (talk) 22:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Tibetians can say different words but in peace.

Monks and Tibetians should not set fire on cars and shops but protest in peace against the bad rules of government. The police & soldiers should be against those people with plastic bullet, strong water or others of low-risk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.5.246.220 (talk) 03:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocking of comments by pro-Chinese government internet users

Reports have come from some internet users (including some in North America) who attempted to post pro-Chinese Government comments on sites such as Youtube and others, which were deleted/removed by site administrators. Any information on this would be beneficial to presenting the "full picture" of this story. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.242.80 (talk) 12:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

quotations around "violent array of sabotage" has to be removed. it is an oblious punctuation of sarcasim. since articles are only supposed to state facts, no opinions should be implied. since resource is reliable, why not post it? stating it's reliable doesn't prove it actually is. how do you know the facts from rioters are reliable? since they are only doing it out of savagery, isn't it logical for them to lie and overly exagerate?

                                                                                                      unknown  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.148.152.76 (talk) 05:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)