Comments:Three new dinosaurs discovered in Australia

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

• Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
• Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
• You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Click here to add a new comment · Add onto existing comments

NOTHING is more terrifying than a velociraptor. 71.120.114.83 (talk) 22:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

THIS IS A GOOD THOUGHT BECAUSE GIRAFFES ALSO HAVE LONG NECKS........... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.227.254 (talk) 04:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

time lines

How can it be 65 million years old? How can they prove that? The Bible is only approximately 6000 years old. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.230.42.102 (talk) 04:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "it was shit cause half aint tr..."

it was shit cause half aint true —202.173.133.235 (talk) 03:50, 31 August 2010 (UTC)