Comments:Texas police: 2-year old crushed by relative

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Anonymous101 in topic Update to this story

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


I think that was senseless

2 year old dies because of fatzo

edit

My question remains what happened to the relative that killed the boy, and will he be charged for man slaughter? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.30.56.149 (talk) 21:32, 22 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wacknews

edit

Wackynews? --Anonymous101 (talk · contribs) 07:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Manslaughter

edit

Assuming the autopsy and other tests indicate no foul play at work, I seriously doubt the man will face criminal charges. There are affirmative defenses for 'accidents' anyways, so I doubt it would hold up in the court as the man didn't intend to fall on the boy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.80.72.253 (talk) 18:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

H47Yeah!!!

edit

it said that there was no foul play But jus to make sure they should still investigate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.125.155.90 (talk) 17:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why would you drop off your 2 year old off at a morbidly obese family members house? How are they going to chase around a 2 year old? I think the parents should be investigated as well! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.227.78.98 (talk) 14:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

that sucks for that kid —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.177.37.202 (talk) 15:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hahahahahaha!

edit

Man, this news is SO WACKY!!! --66.45.128.231 01:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Update to this story

edit

Update to this story, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23824904/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.90.35.11 (talk) 19:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the link. I am writing an article on this nnow. Decided not to write article on it as it is too old--A101 - (talk) 20:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Reply