Comments:Ten-year-old computer glitch prevents delivery of 1,380 Canadian health results
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
Only 1380 out of 2.2 million results failed? That's a failure rate of only 0.062%! They should consider themselves blessed to have a fax machine that doesn't need to be kicked every so often to get it to behave! --98.110.200.96 (talk) 15:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I guess they were more concerned that this had been going on for 10 years without a fix. Still, point taken, a remarkably low failure rate. 206.248.164.192 (talk) 19:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
old and new
editIn other news: "NEW computer software" has dozens of glitches and delivers 160000 heatlh records from Californians to cyper-crooks!
- Those damned cyper-crooks. They need to change the whole healthcare system to MACs, they're better at life stuff I hear.