Comments:Syrian citizen journalists risk death, targeted; city of Homs facing starvation

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Free Syrian Army is a terrorist because they kill many people in the univerysity of halep. They kill many people at the border of turkey and syria. So that the sustaining countries (such as usa) to the free syrian army are also terrorist countries.

Bah, if this is supposed to be "unbiased" accounting, then it's better the corporate news. At least there the agenda is rather clear...

I sincerely hope you're not conflating balance with bias.

Even though the style is still a little "iffy" in places, the value of the content and the far-reaching impact of the actions depicted are extremely valuable journalism!! —Bddpaux (talk) 16:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

With the amount of work that went into copyediting and reviewing DragonFire1024's first submission in quite some time, I'm keen to know where you see "iffy" stylistic points.

A look at the edit history will show ~100 edits between review submission and publication.

Y'know what? I wish our biggest problem was articles like this one! As far as OR goes, it needs its own one-of-a-kind Barnstar!!! Bddpaux (talk) 03:11, 28 February 2012 (UTC)