Comments:Study concludes 9/11 firefighters are 19% more likely to develop cancer

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion


Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Google "China Syndrome at the WTC"116:58, 23 October 2011
Comments from feedback form - "i really dont care- at least t..."313:40, 6 September 2011

Google "China Syndrome at the WTC"

Everyone needs to learn that 9/11 was the American regime nuking its own largest city, and it created the China Syndrome which then poisoned thousands of responders and millions of NY residents. (talk)00:40, 5 September 2011

Comments from feedback form - "i really dont care- at least t..."

i really dont care- at least they are alive. they have the best health insurance in america- get over it. (talk)16:37, 4 September 2011

Get Over It? what the hell is that supposed to mean! get over yourself you selfish ass!!! (talk)20:51, 4 September 2011

Firefighters are exposed to risks and they knew that when they applied for the job, why the big hoo-ha noise now? (talk) 13:40, 6 September 2011 (UTC) (talk)13:40, 6 September 2011

Google "radioactive mini-nuke fragments" ... China Syndrome at the WTC ... (talk)23:08, 4 September 2011