Comments:Situation at damaged nuclear power plant remains 'very grave', says Japanese Prime Minister

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
boom | 3 | 22:21, 22 April 2011 |
Fallout IRL | 0 | 08:54, 31 March 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "well done" | 0 | 19:46, 27 March 2011 |
Comments from feedback form - "Awesome. =]" | 1 | 06:32, 26 March 2011 |
Here goes Chernobyl all over again. Japan becomes a nuclear wasteland and everybody dies. :(
Actually due to the way that such things spread, only a small area ever gets affected. IIRC the strength of a cloud of radiation (or any other cloud:P) decreases with the square of the distance, barring extenuating circumstances (IE, part of the cloud being caught in a jetstream). Even at Chernobyl (which was WAY worse that what happened in Japan) you don't have to get very far away from the site of the accident before everything is ~normal again.
it is now classified as level 7
Kind of.. 71.243.57.74 (talk) 08:54, 31 March 2011 (UTC)