Comments:Sitcom star Roseanne Barr announces run for U.S. president

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Comments from feedback form - "I love this woman. She is amaz..."

I love this woman. She is amazing!

142.179.247.38 (talk)21:15, 25 June 2012

Roseanne Barr

Roseanne Barr is known for getting numerous men and women to aide Roseanne in this campaign. She gains trust, her people do her work for her, and in the end she yanks the carpet out from under them. She has a reputation for hating men out of impulse and she is unpredictable. Roseanne has taken the work people have done for her for granted since 2006. The People aren't safe with Roseanne Barr as a President or as a Mormon claiming that she would enter the Israel Temple and raise herself to Prime Minister of Israel. She has made numerous threats to various world leaders and is a war monger herself.

75.70.83.91 (talk)05:57, 24 August 2011

Comments from feedback form - "A comedian makes a running gag..."

A comedian makes a running gag again (she's also said she was running for PM of Israel) and we cover it like real news? Why?

165.189.32.4 (talk)18:11, 11 August 2011

Which is why this isn't in her biography article on Wikipedia.

MikeAllen (talk)08:31, 12 August 2011
 

Comments from feedback form - "Seriously......"

Seriously......

71.211.26.173 (talk)04:57, 8 August 2011

laughable ... not

(1) never held office before ... just what the country needs ... to move from a guy that handed out fliers on street corners to someone with even less executive experience
(2) from her article on wiki i cannot find even one minute of college experience ... just what the country needs ... to move from a guy that at least went to Harvard law to a person whose background is no better that a monkey in a cage that throws its feccess

70.162.171.210 (talk)12:40, 6 August 2011

This is just making a mockery of the US Presidential system. Her running, not what you said.

64.234.21.239 (talk)15:13, 6 August 2011
 

Wow, elitism much? Didn't go to college? Abe Lincoln didn't. Hasn't held office? George Washington hadn't.

That being said, this would be awful for America. 204.116.109.80 (talk) 00:55, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

204.116.109.80 (talk)00:55, 7 August 2011

To be honest, both Lincoln and Washington lived in VERY different times. You cannot compare their experience and education with what is expected now. Lincoln is defined by the American civil war, and Washington rose to prominence thanks to the American revolutionary war. Both led a fledgling nation that was not yet a prominent player in international politics. Both were leaders during wartime on American soil. (Yes, I know that the war was over by the time Washington became president.)

Lincoln led during a crisis that threatened the existence of the USA, and Washington led during and after a revolution, a most important time during the formation of any country.

Compare that with the rather agressive superstate the current presidents will have to lead.

I sincerely hope the American people will vote for experienced and educated men or women to lead the USA, and to be their local representatives as well.

81.164.73.20 (talk)12:23, 7 August 2011
 
 

Comments from feedback form - "are you kidding with this nutc..."

are you kidding with this nutcase?

66.74.231.15 (talk)09:48, 7 August 2011