Comments:Sexy video clips influence young girls more than boys, study shows

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 41.113.142.209 in topic Nice

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


I agree —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.70.246.41 (talk) 01:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

the sexy video clips might direct both gender in different direction edit

The prof's research tells some good conclussion including the self image of the girls mostly influened by thier parents. It could be true, but which is same to boys in another perspective. the society, tradition and family are the facts determine how the boys define thier self image but these video clips might divert them in to a more hope less directions, such like always behave harsh, adiction, sexully slave to female body/flesh and unlikely become like a male shown in porno videos.

In such kind of research it may give outcome with a narrow decission, but more will resolve lot of society problems and violence —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.82.12 (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC) b by sutharsan je (hhitharshy@yahoo.com)Reply

And what do you expect? edit

Boys already seen everything and more. Why sensored videos would affect them at all? Another stupid test... 82.114.227.57 11:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

true true true —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.239.2.242 (talk) 17:24, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "Not at all colorful. We need t..." edit

Not at all colorful. We need to have a some more colorful page. —57.66.70.225 (talk) 08:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC)Reply


What's a sexy video? Man, I ain't go time for this, I oughtta chop the wood, milk der cow... But yeah girls shouldn't identify with outward appearance, I totally agree. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.107.100.22 (talkcontribs)

This has significant implication for those young girls that are allowed to watch MTV unsupervised.

Further research is bound to show that this promiscuity among girls is more pronounced among the economically disadvantaged.

And the minorities who do not figure prominently in the videos and likely to feel they are 'less' desirable as a consequence.

lol. This is almost always on the top viewed.

I don't think MTV is as much as a problem as Youtube, were the maturity of content is not regulated by what time of the day it is.Ugottoknowme2 (talk) 14:12, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "the artickles are very informa..." edit

the artickles are very informative —75.131.246.193 (talk) 18:27, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

negative influence edit

"... and they (girls) became less resolute in denying permissive sex"

why do the researches label this as "negative influence"? the research seem a lot biased (at least from this description) --187.40.183.119 (talk) 20:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Finally, we can stick it to the feminists.

Comments from feedback form - "wow, what a leap of nonsense. ..." edit

wow, what a leap of nonsense. He went from girls "seeing the videos the girls in the test group felt more strongly that outward appearance was important for girls, and they tended to be less satisfied about their own appearances.": to concluding that girls will do worse in school and will lose self confidence. What utter nonsense. Then they throw that bit about US pscychologists in as if that ridiculous DSM which still believes in the idea of drug addiction having disease status. Get out of here with this nonsense. —184.153.38.6 (talk) 07:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The videos express the dominant ideology in all societies across the globe - women are subject to sexist ideas that their worth is how (sexually) appealing they are. They have it drilled into them from all over (including school) that they are second-class citizens whose only hope is a successful marriage, a mother, and having a (financially) successful husband. Only when we overturn the class relations in society will the image and self-worth of women (and girls) change.

Comments from feedback form - "Extremely wonderful material f..." edit

Extremely wonderful material for youngesters. —115.186.48.101 (talk) 08:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Censored? edit

I'd like to see a larger group plus the effect of uncensored videos before I'd comment either way. --23:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "فلم سكس بنات صغيرات" edit

فلم سكس بنات صغيرات —80.90.164.179 (talk) 20:01, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "Congratulations....very good" edit

Congratulations....very good —189.252.20.163 (talk) 04:26, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "i agry" edit

i agry —59.99.154.60 (talk) 07:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "ajay sharma" edit

ajay sharma —117.196.240.33 (talk) 11:44, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

wtf..gals cando sex wid any1..they hav the right to do..they are legally having sex but nt like mans..

Comments from feedback form - "cc-by" edit

cc-by —84.235.72.52 (talk) 21:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

saxy edit

--182.177.144.242 (talk) 21:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)Bold textReply

Comments from feedback form - "Ben" edit

Ben —174.253.98.202 (talk) 03:50, 28 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "Gkfotog" edit

Gkfotog —92.234.219.18 (talk) 17:05, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "good" edit

good —123.236.34.145 (talk) 10:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "Rxfgg" edit

Rxfgg —76.74.154.208 (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "saxy video" edit

saxy video —223.180.28.121 (talk) 04:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Comments from feedback form - "very nice" edit

very nice —117.217.50.184 (talk) 11:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nice edit

Nice video 41.113.142.209 (talk) 20:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply