Comments:Report says disappearing life threatens biodiversity
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
No surprise. Humans can change their way of living in order to prevent ecological disaster no more than lemmings can. I won't say that humans will be wiped out. We're a resilient race. However, I expect things to become much harder for everybody in the near future. Brace for tomorrow. —Aless.mac (talk) 08:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Disappearing life threatens biodiversity...Edit
What else is new? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 16:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
That less life means less diversity? You think?Edit
This is one of those things where you do not need a test to determine as anyone should be able to see it. You have a bunch of different things, take one away, and now the remainder is less diverse.
Give me the $4 and I could have demonstrated it with a banana, a pear, and an apple. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 02:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)