Comments:Police social media frenzy threatens to prejudice alleged child killer trial
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
Trial by Media | 1 | 23:46, 17 August 2011 |
It happens all the time here in America.
I can imagine it would. As a forensic science graduate I know better and I thought more of the public would too. Personally I think after all their hard work you would expect the police to have said something warning them against such behavior BEFORE they posted the information. Even before the coronial inquest I expected that they wouldn't even think of compiling a normal jury if it ever went to trial. I wouldn't be taking the risk.