Comments:Philippines welcomes world's 7 billionth baby
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
How come! | 0 | 13:48, 14 February 2012 |
How come! | 0 | 13:48, 14 February 2012 |
How come! | 0 | 13:48, 14 February 2012 |
How come! | 0 | 13:48, 14 February 2012 |
Comments from feedback form - "Wow that's great" | 0 | 02:36, 28 November 2011 |
Poor Choice of Words | 0 | 18:17, 4 November 2011 |
Criteria | 2 | 22:19, 1 November 2011 |
method of selection | 0 | 13:09, 1 November 2011 |
How come the UN can figure out that this baby is the 7 billionth baby in the world! How did they, then, prove it?
How come the UN can figure out that this baby is the 7 billionth baby in the world! How did they, then, prove it?
How come the UN can figure out that this baby is the 7 billionth baby in the world! How did they, then, prove it?
How come the UN can figure out that this baby is the 7 billionth baby in the world! How did they, then, prove it?
This is clearly not the "world's 7 billionth baby" if we've reached 7 billion living persons, otherwise we'd all have to be immortal.
Why choose this particular baby, when there are somewhere in the neighborhood of 5 babies being born every second? Clearly there's no way to know that this is exactly the seven billionth, so I'd be interested in knowing the criteria used.