Comments:Pentagon 'don't ask don't tell' poll shows support for repeal

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "Nice try on corrupting the dat..."021:18, 23 December 2010
Why am I not surprised?018:55, 19 December 2010
Comments from feedback form - "McCain needs to give his head ..."100:23, 4 December 2010

Comments from feedback form - "Nice try on corrupting the dat..."

Nice try on corrupting the data to foster your opinion. Why did the AP article indicate fully 60% of combat personnel felt DADT repeal would adversely affect combat readiness? Your sources - NYT, MSNBC, and CNN aren't exactly unbiased in this matter. So, your article is unworthy of educating anyone seeking the facts. Too bad.

207.7.188.154 (talk)21:18, 23 December 2010

Why am I not surprised?

Why is it I am not surprised that McCain opposes repealing the gay ban?

Could it be because he's Republican and thus anti-progressive or the fact that every single Republican in power is trying to defeat anything any Democrat proposes, especially if its Obama?

96.18.79.84 (talk)18:55, 19 December 2010

Comments from feedback form - "McCain needs to give his head ..."

McCain needs to give his head a shake, something is seriously up with his stance on this issue - I believe he has hidden homosexual desires - hence his staunch opposition to the repeal.

70.52.184.241 (talk)01:28, 3 December 2010

You do realize that science has shown that just because someone is against gays does not not mean they are homosexual as well? Admittedly, I don't have the source (can't remember) but automatically pinning on that is a fallacy.

Unless you're a troll. In which case, U MAD?

98.227.182.174 (talk)00:23, 4 December 2010