Comments:Oxford to use online voting for Professor of Poetry election

A unique franchise achieving nothing to do with Poetry edit

Back to article

 

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


The unique point about this election is that voting is almost the last remaining right exerciseable by all Oxford University graduates, as members of the ancient Convocation.

The requirement of voting in person at Oxford used to prevent erratic results; but since the election has frequently produced controversial results, and has now failed to produce an effective appointment, this strategy is inadequate.

It is hard to see how an internet franchise will improve the interests of Poetry! 78.147.11.118 (talk) 18:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC)Reply