Comments:Oxford University anti-peer-to-peer policy hits legal music service Spotify

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Have they never heard of traffic shaping? If they're OK with the content but feel the data is of a low priority then it should be given low priority on the network, not scrubbed entirely. That is something you'd expect from a technologically ignorant parent, and is rather a sad response from such a lauded establishment. (talk) 21:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Nothing surprises me anymore. TBH, Its the authoritarian solution, and theya re fine with it. (talk) 21:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC)