Comments:Norway gunman defends actions as 'gruesome but necessary'

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Wish more length, analysis.

my prayers are with this freedom fighter.156.8.251.250 (talk) 00:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

You are truly a disgusting little shit.

AND A FREEDOM FIGHTER HE IS!! YOU have a disgusting vocabulary...WHY can't he be called a freedom fighter?156.8.251.250 (talk) 07:30, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Latest legal defence regarding the brutal act 1)mental insanity 2)under the influence of Drugs etc etc...

These kinds of random killings are not new. Sometimes there are regrets the 'accused ' had to be shot, depriving the Forensic Psychologist etc investigating the basics.

Fortunately in a neutral Country like Norway, I personally have every faith in the unbiassed Judicial System and the whole World will be watching the Legal proceedings. Norway will have time to recover from Grief and People will hold the Nerve. Good Luck to them to find the root cause. International co-operation should be available if necessary but no interference though, I Hope.

Two whole paragraphs with no new info... waste of a click.

Interesting discussion about how the attacks were not covered by mainstream media. External link to audio or video of program: Norway Attacks Expose U.S. Media’s Double Standard on "Terrorism" 99.189.211.83