Comments:Nobel Peace Prize misused says Norwegian lawyer and activist

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

Frankly, no. They are awarding the prize to individuals who have done nothing directly relating to peace, choosing to pass over those who have worked for international peace. Jade Knight (talk) 19:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

The impact of several items said to be out of line with Nobel's will are not so much out of line, as they are connecting the sentiment of the will with the current situation. The cited example of Gore and the IPCC does seem to qualify as the conflicts in Sudan for example are mainly driven by farm land disputes, aggravated by droughts then known to be connected with anthropogenic climate change. Particulates redirecting the sun exposure at ground level and global warming altering wind currents. Work then aimed at reversing those effects has direct impact on reducing conflict in the world. Basically, this is using the known relationships between things to award the prize to people working on areas that have the same effect, and though that may not be as obvious it is legitimate. 00:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

No, they have not respected Nobel's will. The prize has been used more as a political tool than as a tool for peace. Al Gore should never have won this prize. "Raising awareness" about climate change does nothing to solve the problem, and most certainly does not promote peace. 01:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Of course they aren't following Nobel's will. Al Gore has done absolutely nothing to deserve a peace prize. Maybe an environmental prize or something, but probably not even that since he insists on being paid to tell people how much of a crisis we're in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Of course the peace prize has not been used correctly while else would that war criminal Henry Kissinger have one. And Arafat? the guy's a terrorist. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talkcontribs) 16:06, 9 October 2013