Comments:Negotiations for hijacked Saudi oil tanker begin
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
These Somali Pirates are like cartoons, lets give them their own reality TV show.
Re: Somali Pirates
Why can't a US carrier group (or a British or French carrier) supply airstrikes against any pirate vessel? Our satellites can track these pirates to their base ports in Somalia, or anywhere else. This is exactly the kind of conventional warfare we pay 41% of our taxes for every year. Yet our Navy says it "would have to station a ship every eight miles" and begs off? While we are entering a recession and need to protect trade?
Oil for protectionEdit
Since we usually have a carrier in the middle east, we could station an AWAC in the Somolia area to alert the carrier air wing in the area. A squadron of fighter jets could be dispatched to make short work of pirate vessals. If OPEC would pay the expenses involved and also assure lower and stable oil prices as ancentive, it wuld be a win win situation. An end to piracy on the high seas, and good PR for the usa in the middle east and around the world.18.104.22.168 19:53, 5 December 2008 (UTC)