Comments:NASA's new space capsule to be ready for test flights by 2013

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "Wow,NASA Reach heavenly bodies..."011:53, 1 December 2010
a Joke right?116:08, 20 October 2010
Comments from feedback form - "Fool."013:06, 7 October 2010

Comments from feedback form - "Wow,NASA Reach heavenly bodies..."

Wow,NASA Reach heavenly bodies that have not been able to explore and it will change the world civilization of celestial objects

114.59.233.84 (talk)11:53, 1 December 2010

a Joke right?

obama must of been joking when he asked Nasa to send a shuttle to asteroid or mars instead of the moon right. He would be pretty stupid to think that it would be less expensive than going to the moon.

66.43.238.115 (talk)15:29, 1 October 2010

That's very true! Besides if we set up in the moon first and develop fuel and building materials from resources there the cost of further missions can be halved! We need to set up in the moon BEFORE trying to get to an asteroid or Mars. It's simple logic.

190.207.110.145 (talk)16:08, 20 October 2010
 

Comments from feedback form - "Fool."

Fool.

194.83.232.2 (talk)13:06, 7 October 2010