Comments:Mysterious dimming of Tabby's star likely due to space dust, not alien superstructures, say scientists

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.



Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
I thought so.103:08, 11 January 2018

I thought so.

I feel that if 'Tabby's star' was actually being blocked by a structure big enough to do so, we would have seen/detected radio waves, electromagnetic pulses, that sort of thing

Heliozoan (talk)02:15, 11 January 2018

Maybe. But it can be hard to know how to look for something without actually knowing what it looks like. We don't have any examples of civilizations much more advanced than our own, so how should we know what they typically look like? I see Boyajian saying "whatever is passing between us and the star is not opaque, as would be expected from a planet or alien megastructure", and I think, who says an alien megastructure would be opaque? What proportion of the alien megastructures you've seen were opaque? (Though the scientists can be expected to exercise caution, whereas the mainstream press has tended to characterize the scientific conclusion as "definitely not an alien megastructure".)

Pi zero (talk)03:08, 11 January 2018