Open main menu

Comments:Los Angeles City Council to sue police officer accused of filing a false report

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Comments from feedback form - "How can one ask if Jeffrey Ste..."021:38, 1 February 2011
WoW ReALLy218:19, 1 February 2011

Comments from feedback form - "How can one ask if Jeffrey Ste..."

How can one ask if Jeffrey Stenroos should be forced to pay when the article does not contain any factual matter of investigation - only a statement by anonymous police official - not even account by police officer himself what has happened?

79.180.184.54 (talk)21:37, 1 February 2011

WoW ReALLy

Yes he should pay it ALL back plus whatever anyone else involved is out! What a jerk!!!!

67.128.3.2 (talk)21:20, 29 January 2011

I agree wholeheartedly, he needs to be held accountable for what he's done, not only to the state, but also to those kids stuck in a situation that wasn't even real. Had he spoke the truth about what happened, I believe a less strict punishment would have been instituted, but instead, he took it to another level and for that, he's paying now.

114.77.227.53 (talk)03:20, 31 January 2011
 

he should pay the dues accordingly for creating a ruckus, that no good sloppy dunkin donut eatin jerk!!

24.187.246.122 (talk)18:19, 1 February 2011