Comments:Kansas library discusses Wikipedia

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading


I believe that Wikipedia is a valuable source for anything you need to know. It's good for reports, essays, and general knowledge information. It may not always be accurate, but it usually is. I use Wikipedia more than often to get whatever information that I'm looking for.

The procedure for research that I was taught is fairly straight forward: 1. Start at an encyclopedia to get a general understanding. 2. Read the materials referenced in the encyclopedia to get a more complete understanding of the subject material. Since wikipedia articles typically contain references to peer-reviewed sources, I don't see any problem with using it for academic research. However, instead of quoting the wiki article, a student should use it as a portal to quotable sources. Rdbrady 07:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)