Comments:Judge continues injunction against 'Expelled' film
Why did the producers violate copyright?
edit
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
I don't see why they chose to violate copyirght. Its hardly a surprise that this happened. —Anonymous101 :) 05:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
When you get the flak it means you're over the target
editThe demons of hell really are out to get this film because it's working. --64.180.226.234 08:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
PS. Yoko Ono is bitter because God had her husband killed after he said he was bigger than Jesus. --64.180.226.234 08:17, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
lol. the 'demons of hell' are now concerning themselves with the proper prosecution of copyright infringement cases? i was waiting for some idiot to come along and suggest this case is a further example of the ID view being 'expelled', but your comments will suffice. -Imind (talk) 17:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)