Comments:Iraqi Airways drops flights to United Kingdom and Sweden

Back to article

Wikinews commentary.svg

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. Please remain on topic and avoid offensive or inflammatory comments where possible. Try thought-provoking, insightful, or controversial. Civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Use the "Start a new discussion" button just below to start a new discussion. If the button isn't there, wait a few seconds and click this link: Refresh.

Start a new discussion


Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Dissolving the airline1214:20, 27 May 2010
Comments from feedback form - "good"015:49, 26 May 2010

Dissolving the airline

If they honestly believe that by dissolving the airline and reforming it they can escape returning what they have stolen, they are in for a serious shock next time they return to the UK.

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs)15:52, 26 May 2010

Not true, the debt is with the Government so if private investors take over Iraqi Airways then Kuwaiti can do nothing. Zaps93 (talk) 09:43, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Zaps93 (talk)09:43, 27 May 2010

Same assets.

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs)09:45, 27 May 2010

The debt was never held with the airline, instead the Government, if Iraqi becomes private Kuwait can do nothing to the airline only the Government.

Zaps93 (talk)09:55, 27 May 2010

That might work in Iraq, but in the UK it is likely to be held that the new owner inherited the theft and hence the responsibility to pay back. The court will recognise that it is the same airline and so dissolving it is a waste of time. If they want to try that trick they'd save time just selling it and crossing their fingers somebody will be sill (or brave) enough to try it.

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs)09:58, 27 May 2010

As far as I'm aware the UK can't do anything to it unless they have evidence to say that the new owners stole the aircraft and the part. I think Kuwaiti have acted immature, yes there was a debt, yes Iraq should have sorted it, but Kuwaiti acted completely un proffesional. On another note, if a private investor takes over, the airline will be rebranded to something like Iraqi Airlines or Air Iraq therefore wiping debts like Olympic Airlines did with Olympic Airways.

Zaps93 (talk)10:00, 27 May 2010

That possibly should be the case - but it isn't. Once it is established the airline is the same entity, then it becomes liable for the thefts again, since they were effectively conducted by Iraqi; at the very least, Iraqi accepted stolen goods.

A better bet might be to asset strip the airline - sell off the aircraft etc individually, rather than selling an intact airline.

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs)10:09, 27 May 2010

Who knows, we'll have to wait and see what the outcome is.

Zaps93 (talk)10:10, 27 May 2010

It'll certainly be interesting to watch. I hope they can resolve this get to the UK sometime.

Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs)10:13, 27 May 2010

So true. I think they need to come to some arrangement. Not only did Kuwait suffer under Saddam but so did the Iraqi people.

Zaps93 (talk)10:15, 27 May 2010

Comments from feedback form - "good"

good (talk)15:49, 26 May 2010