Comments:Iraq banned from participating in Beijing Olympics

Latest comment: 15 years ago by in topic This is bad

Back to article

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

how is the govt interfering? - Imind (talk) 20:38, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

This is bad


One of the main purposes of the Olympics, is to forget political conflicts, and to come together in the spirit of athletics. Iraq being banned goes in direct conflict with this ideal. Not only does this make China look worse than it does, but it begins a slippery slope to politicizing a great event. Shame on China. -- Poe Joe (Talk) 20:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re-read the article. It was not China took the decision, but the IOC. --Brian McNeil / talk 20:54, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I apologize for my comments against China. But. This is much worse! The IOU agreeing to this atrocity?! Like User:Louis Waweru said, these athletes have endured so much for this. And my comment that the Olympics is becoming politicized still stands. They have the same right as any other Olympic athlete to complete. It really is a shame. -- Poe Joe (Talk) 04:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I can't imagine what kind of training the athletes have endured. It's a shame that politics has ruined this for them. There should really be a team under the banner of Earth or something for people like them. Louis Waweru  Talk  22:24, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I liked the rather facetious comment on the BBC site about the athlete who tried to appeal his lifetime Olympic ban. They called for a "drugged-up Olympics" just so they could see a man outrun a tiger. --Brian McNeil / talk 22:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, the purpose of the Olympics is to gain money for the IOC. I don't think this is politics so much as just beurocrasy. I mean the IOC does so many other underhanded things, they need to keep the Olympics respectable in some ways, including perhaps restricting the involvement of governments. Or maybe the no government rule is just to help maintain their power. <shrug> 10:11, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply



How can Iraq interfere with the Olympics? An odd punishment. Makes me wonder whether the U.S. government is seeking retribution for the Iraqi government expressing a public desire for a timeline. Manlong (talk) 15:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply